The phrase established community can hide a phase difference. At Bloom Living, some people already live in earlier homes. Alhambra is a newer release within the same wider development. Both statements can be true, but they should not be collapsed into an assertion that Alhambra itself is complete.
Illustrative image of the planned Alhambra setting, not proof of current occupancy.
What Bloom actually reported
In its Alhambra launch, Bloom says Cordoba and Toledo residents are already living in those first and second phases. The same announcement describes Alhambra as the final release and introduces Souk Alhambra and a broader mix of homes. The occupied earlier phases provide context for Bloom Living. They do not establish that Alhambra's buildings or souk are open.
The Alhambra project page describes home types and planned facilities. It is a starting point for a buyer enquiry, not a substitute for current construction and handover evidence for a named unit.
Questions that settle the phase issue
Ask which building or townhouse row contains the offered home. What is its current construction status? Which amenities are operating in Bloom Living today, and which are scheduled for the Alhambra release? Is access to an existing amenity included for this home? What written delivery estimate applies to this building?
A seller can use the occupied earlier phases as accurately attributed context, then state Alhambra's own status separately. A buyer can evaluate the convenience of an emerging centre without being told it is already functioning. This specific distinction is more useful than a general claim that the masterplan is mature. The Alhambra project guide provides the wider phase context.